Topic summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video558 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Employee Severance results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 860 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,674 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,944 of 16,562 topics). This Employee Severance is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Employee Severance
Topic details
Total words: 1,674
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos