Topic summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video1,082 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emissions Trading results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 2,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (12,441 of 22,945 topics). This Emissions Trading is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Emissions Trading
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,328
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Composition/Division: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos