Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Emissions results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 564 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,350 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,391 topics). This Emissions is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Emissions
Topic details
Total words: 2,350
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos