Topic summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electronic Warfare results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 854 hits. Analysis detected 5,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,489 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,466 of 15,765 topics). This Electronic Warfare is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Electronic Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 3,489
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.7% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 24.5%24.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.3%16.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.0%10.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos