Topic summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video924 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electricity Prices results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 2,270 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,282 of 16,562 topics). This Electricity Prices is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Electricity Prices
Topic details
Total words: 2,772
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.1% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos