Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electricity Consumption results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 352 hits. Analysis detected 2,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,476 of 16,562 topics). This Electricity Consumption is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Electricity Consumption
Topic details
Total words: 2,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.9% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.7%13.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos