Topic summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video1,332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electric Vehicle Discontinuation results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 423 hits. Analysis detected 2,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,936 of 16,558 topics). This Electric Vehicle Discontinuation is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Electric Vehicle Discontinuation
Topic details
Total words: 3,996
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos