Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electoral Campaigns results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 821 hits. Analysis detected 5,963 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (5,975 of 15,387 topics). This Electoral Campaigns is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Electoral Campaigns
Topic details
Total words: 4,456
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.0%15.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos