Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Election Laws And Regulations results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,502 hits. Analysis detected 8,583 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,447 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,558 topics). This Election Laws And Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Election Laws And Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 15,447
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos