Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Funding results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 52.6% saturation with 219 hits. Analysis detected 1,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (124 of 16,562 topics). This Election Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
Election Funding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510099.3% percentile
25.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles416 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 47.8%47.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 52.6%52.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 43.8%43.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 29.8%29.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 15.1%15.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 16.8%16.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 23.6%23.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 52.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 47.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 43.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 29.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos