Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Fraud Claims results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 1,413 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (15,471 of 16,562 topics). This Election Fraud Claims is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Election Fraud Claims
Topic details
Total words: 3,480
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751006.6% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos