Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Deniers results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 48% saturation with 216 hits . Analysis detected 1,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 450 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.9% and a BS Rank of 96% (654 of 16,356 topics). This Election Deniers is worse (more manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group. Election Deniers
Topic details
Total words: 450
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.0% percentile 13.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles450 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 48.0% 48.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 42.7% 42.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 32.7% 32.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 43.3% 43.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 32.9% 32.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 48.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 43.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 42.7%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Topic 32.9%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 32.7%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst