Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Election Day results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 359 hits. Analysis detected 2,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,092 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,612 topics). This Election Day is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Election Day
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,092
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos