Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Edwards Air Force Base Incident results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 949 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Edwards Air Force Base Incident is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Edwards Air Force Base Incident
Topic details
Total words: 1,732
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos