Topic summary
⁠14%1 analyzed article/video1,109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Educational Institutions results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 512 hits. Analysis detected 1,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,327 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (14,070 of 16,562 topics). This Educational Institutions is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Educational Institutions
Topic details
Total words: 3,327
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510015.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 15.4%15.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos