Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Editorial Submissions results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Optimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 188 faulty-reasoning hits from 500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,533 of 16,562 topics). This Editorial Submissions is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Editorial Submissions
Topic details
Total words: 500
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.7% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles500 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 23.0%23.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.4%2.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos