Topic summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Editorial Interference results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,815 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,185 of 16,562 topics). This Editorial Interference is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Editorial Interference
Topic details
Total words: 1,815
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos