Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,686 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Editing And Transparency results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 1,489 hits. Analysis detected 8,242 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,058 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,077 of 16,562 topics). This Editing And Transparency is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Editing And Transparency
Topic details
Total words: 5,058
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 21.6%21.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 12.3%12.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 11.2%11.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.4%29.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos