Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ecosystem Health results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 2.8% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 202 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,910 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Ecosystem Health is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ecosystem Health
Topic details
Total words: 1,910
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos