Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,445 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Systems results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 711 hits. Analysis detected 6,367 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,789 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Systems is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Economic Systems
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,780
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos