Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Economic Risk results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 1,196 hits. Analysis detected 8,316 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,037 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Risk is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Economic Risk
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,037
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 23.7%23.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.0%17.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.4%13.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos