Topic summary
⁠88%2 analyzed articles/videos716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Revitalization results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 1,299 hits. Analysis detected 7,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,416 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,684 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Revitalization is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Economic Revitalization
Topic details
Total words: 6,416
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 20.3%20.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos