Topic summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video1,478 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Opportunity results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 335 hits. Analysis detected 3,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,434 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,701 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Opportunity is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Economic Opportunity
Topic details
Total words: 4,434
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos