Topic summary
⁠78%2 analyzed articles/videos489 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Justice results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 479 hits. Analysis detected 1,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,956 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (7,034 of 22,940 topics). This Economic Justice is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Economic Justice
Topic details
Total words: 1,956
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 24.5%24.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.3%15.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Composition/Division: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos