Topic summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos5,063 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Impact Of Ai results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 2,007 hits. Analysis detected 14,005 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,189 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,960 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Impact Of Ai is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Economic Impact Of Ai
Topic details
Total words: 15,189
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.2%13.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos