Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video541 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Fears results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 302 hits. Analysis detected 2,389 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,370 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Fears is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Economic Fears
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.5% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.0%14.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos