Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Economic Downturn results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 959 hits. Analysis detected 4,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Downturn is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Economic Downturn
Topic details
Total words: 3,324
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.9%28.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.0%16.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos