Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Competition results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 351 hits. Analysis detected 2,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,623 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Competition is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Economic Competition
Topic details
Total words: 3,912
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos