Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,083 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Bubbles results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 597 hits. Analysis detected 4,132 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,429 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Bubbles is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Economic Bubbles
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,332
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos