Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dutch Golden Age results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 119 hits . Analysis detected 914 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,558 topics). This Dutch Golden Age is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Dutch Golden Age
Topic details
Total words: 1,844
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst