Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dusty May results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 622 hits. Analysis detected 4,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (7,621 of 15,414 topics). This Dusty May is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Dusty May
Topic details
Total words: 4,164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.8%14.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.4%12.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos