Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Duke Of Windsor's Alleged Nazi Collaboration results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 671 hits. Analysis detected 4,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Duke Of Windsor's Alleged Nazi Collaboration is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Duke Of Windsor's Alleged Nazi Collaboration
Topic details
Total words: 5,436
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos