Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 295 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dui / Impairment results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 54.4% saturation with 481 hits . Analysis detected 2,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 885 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,144 of 16,562 topics). This Dui / Impairment is worse (more manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group. Dui / Impairment
Topic details
Total words: 885
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.1% percentile 10.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles885 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 54.4% 54.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 42.9% 42.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 29.1% 29.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 28.3% 28.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 16.5% 16.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Topic 54.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 42.9%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 29.1%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Horn Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst