Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Drug Smuggling Charge results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 489 hits. Analysis detected 2,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,869 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Drug Smuggling Charge is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Drug Smuggling Charge
Topic details
Total words: 1,869
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 26.2%26.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.5%17.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.6%8.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos