Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Overdoses results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 874 hits. Analysis detected 7,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,415 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,642 of 16,562 topics). This Drug Overdoses is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Drug Overdoses
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,415
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos