Topic summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 899 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Compounding results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and False Dilemma , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 651 hits . Analysis detected 3,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,697 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (3,544 of 16,562 topics). This Drug Compounding is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Drug Compounding
Topic details
Total words: 2,697
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.6% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 19.3% 19.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 8.1% 8.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 24.1% 24.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst