Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Abuse results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 1,881 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (15,353 of 16,562 topics). This Drug Abuse is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group.
Drug Abuse
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751007.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos