Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Drone Technology results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 686 hits . Analysis detected 5,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,864 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Drone Technology is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Drone Technology
Topic details
Total words: 6,864
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst