Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drinking Water results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 364 hits. Analysis detected 2,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,586 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (14,560 of 16,562 topics). This Drinking Water is better (less manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Drinking Water
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,586
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510012.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos