Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 743 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drake Maye results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hindsight Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 855 hits . Analysis detected 3,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,229 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,868 of 16,562 topics). This Drake Maye is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group. Drake Maye
Topic details
Total words: 2,229
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.7% percentile 8.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 25.4% 25.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 38.4% 38.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 38.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.7%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst