Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Draftkings results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 772 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,594 of 16,343 topics). This Draftkings is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Draftkings
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,172
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.1% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.2%9.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.1%13.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos