Topic summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Draft Strategy results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 2,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,875 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,331 of 16,562 topics). This Draft Strategy is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Draft Strategy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,875
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.8% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.9%14.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.6%10.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos