Topic summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Donna Peyton results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Self-Serving Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 1,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,125 of 15,966 topics). This Donna Peyton is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Donna Peyton
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,088
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 11.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos