Topic summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Don Lemon results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 367 hits. Analysis detected 2,011 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,955 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,526 of 16,562 topics). This Don Lemon is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Don Lemon
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,955
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos