Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Domestic Politics results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38% saturation with 550 hits. Analysis detected 3,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Domestic Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Domestic Politics
Topic details
Total words: 1,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 38.0%38.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 22.4%22.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 20.3%20.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.3%7.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.5%9.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.8%12.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 38.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 29.8%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos