Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dog Adoption results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 309 hits. Analysis detected 2,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,147 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,447 topics). This Dog Adoption is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Dog Adoption
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,147
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos