Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dodgers Season results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 95.8% saturation with 227 hits. Analysis detected 1,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 237 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (79 of 16,562 topics). This Dodgers Season is worse (more manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
Dodgers Season
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 237
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

100% percentile
025507510099.5% percentile
30.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles237 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 82.3%82.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 75.5%75.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 95.8%95.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 73.8%73.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 41.4%41.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 27.4%27.4%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 25.3%25.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 25.7%25.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 24.1%24.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Topic 95.8%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 82.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 75.5%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 73.8%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Topic 41.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 25.7%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 17.3%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos