Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video2,004 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doctor Compensation results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 530 hits. Analysis detected 4,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,012 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,167 of 16,562 topics). This Doctor Compensation is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Doctor Compensation
Topic details
Total words: 6,012
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos