Topic summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dna Data Storage results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 2,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,258 of 16,562 topics). This Dna Data Storage is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Dna Data Storage
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠75%Dna Data Storage (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,160
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.6%16.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 13.5%13.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 16.7%16.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos