Topic summary
1% 1 analyzed article/video 3,084 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dive Bars results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 2.2% saturation with 267 hits . Analysis detected 2,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (16,550 of 16,562 topics). This Dive Bars is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group. Dive Bars
Topic details
Total words: 12,336
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.1% percentile 0.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst